Deployed bytecode reproducibility
Jupiter's assessment for RD-F-145 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Aggregator and perps programs: not reproducible by third parties — closed-source binary. Jupiter Lend (open-source): Code4rena repo specifies rustc 1.81.0 + Solana CLI 2.3.0, making reproducible build theoretically possible from published source. However no independent build verification is documented. Mixed: open-source Lend is yellow (spec provided but not verified); closed-source aggregator/perps are non-reproducible.
Sources #
- GitHubcode-423n4/2026-02-jupiter-lend | GitHubJupiter Lend Code4rena — build spec (rustc 1.81.0, Solana CLI 2.3.0)retrieved 2026-04-29
Methodology #
Determine whether anyone can independently reproduce the deployed bytecode from the repo and declared build toolchain.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →