Hot-wallet signer flag

Jupiter's assessment for RD-F-030 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Multisig signer addresses not publicly disclosed. Cannot assess hot-wallet behavioral patterns. Structural data gap — no on-chain address list is available to run heuristic analysis.

Sources #

Curator note
JUP Minting and Accountability forum — signer identities named but addresses not disclosedSigner addresses not disclosed in any public Jupiter documentation reviewedretrieved 2026-04-29

Methodology #

Determine whether ≥1 multisig signer address exhibits on-chain behavior consistent with a hot wallet (web-wallet signing pattern, no hardware signing indicators).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol jupiter factor RD-F-030 score gray collected_at 2026-04-29 11:51:25