defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Insurance coverage active

Jupiter Perpetual Exchange's assessment for RD-F-089 — scored red on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

No active insurance coverage found for the JLP pool ($691.3M TVL) on any major platform. Nexus Mutual: Ethereum-based; no Solana protocol cover product confirmed. Sherlock: no Jupiter Perps coverage or contest found. Immunefi: no Jupiter Perps insurance product (the OOOSec bug bounty announced May 2025 is a separate disclosure-incentive program, not an insurance product). Unslashed: no coverage identified. JLP holders bear full financial risk of net trader P&L — $691M pool with no insurance backstop is a material gap for a protocol of this scale.

Sources #

  • URL
    Immunefi — Bug Bounty ExplorerImmunefi bounty explorer — searched 'Jupiter'; no Jupiter Perps insurance/coverage listing found; only bug bounty platform, not insuranceretrieved 2026-05-16
  • URL
    Nexus MutualNexus Mutual website — searched 'Jupiter'; no Jupiter Perps protocol cover product found; Nexus Mutual primarily covers Ethereum protocolsretrieved 2026-05-16
  • URL
    What is JLP? — Jupiter SupportJLP Economics support page — no insurance fund or third-party coverage mentioned; JLP holders are the counterparty to all trader positions with no insurance backstopretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine whether active coverage on Nexus Mutual, Unslashed, Sherlock, or equivalent is in force; record cover size in USD.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol jupiter-perps factor RD-F-089 score red collected_at 2026-05-16 01:53:11