Security-Council threshold reduction (RT)
Jito's assessment for RD-F-182 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Batch-24 addition: Security-Council threshold reduction event. Jito has a Security Council per constitutional docs (minimum 5 members, Foundation Director-established, emergency veto rights on JIPs). No SC threshold reduction event detected as of 2026-04-29. Governance parameter change (quorum 30M → 10M JTO) was a DAO parameter update — distinct from SC multisig threshold reduction (the Drift-class DPRK precursor pattern). SC signer addresses not publicly published; governance-admin-analyst should enumerate via Realms program state. T-09 v1.1 candidate signal.
Sources #
- DocsJito Foundation ConstitutionJito Constitution — Security Council: minimum 5 members, Foundation Director-established; emergency veto rights; transparency report required after Emergency Actionsretrieved 2026-04-29
- The Hacker News — $285M Drift Hack DPRK AttributionDrift Protocol April 2026 exploit: UNC4736/DPRK executed 3/5 → 2/5 SC threshold reduction + timelock removal 6 days before $285M exploit. Jito SC shows no analogous event.retrieved 2026-04-29
Methodology #
Detect in real-time whether the bridge/protocol Security Council multisig executes a threshold reduction (e.g. 3/5 → 2/5), timelock removal, or new-signer addition within ≤14 days of either of those events.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →