Repo shows AI-tool co-authorship in critical files
Hyperliquid's assessment for RD-F-172 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No AI-tool co-authorship (Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] or similar) found in the Bridge2 commit history. All 24 commits appear to be from human authors addressing specific finding numbers or making functional changes. The repo is small and commit messages are highly specific.
Sources #
- GitHubhyperliquid-dex/contracts commit historyhyperliquid-dex/contracts commit list — 24 commits with specific functional messages, no AI-tool attributions visibleretrieved 2026-04-28
Methodology #
Determine whether critical security files show commits with AI-tool co-authorship metadata (GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT Code Interpreter).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol hyperliquid factor RD-F-172 score green collected_at 2026-04-28 13:58:49