ENS/NameStone identity bound to deployer
Hyperliquid's assessment for RD-F-117 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No ENS or NameStone name found bound to deployer 0x1D4c01E15A637cB3cbaF86fFbb02E5A260D01fbc. Hyperliquid uses a .hl naming system on HyperEVM (separate from Ethereum ENS). No public claim that any ENS name is bound to any Hyperliquid team wallet. Factor not applicable in the typical sense for this protocol.
Sources #
- Docshttps://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/hyperevmretrieved 2026-04-28
- https://arbiscan.io/address/0x2df1c51e09aecf9cacb7bc98cb1742757f163df7retrieved 2026-04-28
Methodology #
Determine whether the deployer address has a bound ENS or NameStone name resolvable to a verifiable identity.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol hyperliquid factor RD-F-117 score gray collected_at 2026-04-28 13:58:49