Code complexity vs audit coverage

Hyperliquid's assessment for RD-F-024 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Bridge2.sol is approximately 400–500 LOC. Signature.sol is ~50 LOC. Total codebase under 600 LOC with 3 audit engagements. LOC/audit-day ratio is well within credible audit coverage range for the Bridge2 EVM surface. L1 binary complexity is unknowable but Bridge2 is the assessed surface.

Sources #

GitHub
hyperliquid-dex/contracts repository listinghyperliquid-dex/contracts repo listing — Bridge2.sol, Signature.sol, tests/retrieved 2026-04-28

Methodology #

Determine whether the cyclomatic complexity or LOC-per-audit-day ratio exceeds the curator-declared credibility threshold for the audit to be meaningful.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol hyperliquid factor RD-F-024 score green collected_at 2026-04-28 13:58:49