defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Constructor calls _disableInitializers()

Hyperliquid's assessment for RD-F-023 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Bridge2.sol uses a constructor but does NOT call _disableInitializers(). Since Bridge2 does not use an initializer pattern (uses a real constructor), the OZ guidance is not structurally required — the constructor IS the initialization. However, defense-in-depth practice would still apply _disableInitializers() to prevent any future confusion. Slightly below best practice for a proxy-wrapped contract.

Sources #

  • GitHub
    Bridge2.sol raw sourceBridge2.sol raw source — constructor present without _disableInitializers()retrieved 2026-04-28

Methodology #

Determine whether implementation contract constructors call `_disableInitializers()` to prevent re-initialization of the implementation directly.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol hyperliquid factor RD-F-023 score yellow collected_at 2026-04-28 13:58:49