Permissionless-pool lending oracle
Hyperlane's assessment for RD-F-181 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Not a lending protocol. No permissionless pool oracle acceptance in any confirmed code path. Hyperlane's permissionless ISM architecture is about message verification (validator signatures), not token pricing from permissionless DEX pools. F181 (permissionless-pool lending oracle / isolation-tier config) is structurally inapplicable to a bridge protocol.
Sources #
- InternalHyperlane profile — bridge classification, no lending surface00-profile.md §1 — category: BRIDGE; 00-data-cache.json borrow.present=false; no lending surfaceretrieved 2026-05-17
Methodology #
Determine whether the lending protocol accepts spot prices from a DEX where any user can permissionlessly create new pools, without requiring a TWAP window, liquidity floor, or token-age minimum on the venue side.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →