Fork retains upstream audit coverage
Hyperlane's assessment for RD-F-131 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No upstream fork; upstream audit retention question is moot. Hyperlane has its own direct audit coverage assessed under Cat 1.
Sources #
- GitHubHyperlane Monorepohyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-monorepo — original protocol with direct audit coverageretrieved 2026-05-17
Methodology #
Determine whether the fork's deployed code is covered by either: (a) the upstream audit plus a delta-audit for fork-specific changes, or (b) a fresh independent audit of the fork.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol hyperlane factor RD-F-131 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 23:03:56