Bridge TVL per validator ratio
Fluid's assessment for RD-F-157 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
CCIP TVL secured by Fluid Lite bridge cannot be precisely isolated from the broader CCIP infrastructure (which secures billions across many protocols). The $106M Plasma TVL and $115M Arbitrum TVL that transit CCIP are relevant, but CCIP's overall TVL/validator ratio is a property of Chainlink's network, not Fluid specifically. Gray — factor applies at the bridge-operator level which is Chainlink's infrastructure, not directly Fluid-controllable.
Sources #
- Curator noteCCIP — network-level TVL/validator ratioCCIP TVL/validator ratio is a Chainlink network property; Fluid-specific bridge TVL not isolatableretrieved 2026-04-29
Methodology #
Compute bridge TVL divided by validator count as a concentration-of-compromise measure.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →