Fork retains upstream audit coverage
Falcon Finance's assessment for RD-F-131 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Not a fork. Has its own independent audit history (Zellic x2, Pashov x1). Upstream audit coverage concept is N/A.
Detail #
Protocol is not a fork per profile §5. Original audit coverage via 3 engagements from 2 firms.
Sources #
- Docs
Methodology #
Determine whether the fork's deployed code is covered by either: (a) the upstream audit plus a delta-audit for fork-specific changes, or (b) a fresh independent audit of the fork.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol falcon-finance factor RD-F-131 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-12 04:06:37