Bridge signer-set change proposed/executed
Falcon Finance's assessment for RD-F-103 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Bridge signer set change | Applicable: No (has_bridge_surface: false; single-chain Ethereum protocol; no bridge validator set) | Signal N/A. Would not fire.
Detail #
Falcon Finance profile flags has_bridge_surface: false. The protocol is 100% Ethereum TVL with no active bridge architecture. BNB/XDC peripheral deployments have negligible TVL and undocumented bridge mechanism. No bridge validator/signer set exists to monitor for threshold changes or signer additions/removals. Signal cannot apply.
Sources #
- Curator noteFalcon Finance profile meta — has_bridge_surface: false.research/protocols/falcon-finance/00-profile.meta.json §specialist_flags.has_bridge_surface: falseretrieved 2026-05-12
Methodology #
Detect whether a bridge validator or signer-set change has been proposed or executed.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →