defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Bridge signer-set change proposed/executed

Falcon Finance's assessment for RD-F-103 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Bridge signer set change | Applicable: No (has_bridge_surface: false; single-chain Ethereum protocol; no bridge validator set) | Signal N/A. Would not fire.

Detail #

Falcon Finance profile flags has_bridge_surface: false. The protocol is 100% Ethereum TVL with no active bridge architecture. BNB/XDC peripheral deployments have negligible TVL and undocumented bridge mechanism. No bridge validator/signer set exists to monitor for threshold changes or signer additions/removals. Signal cannot apply.

Sources #

  • Curator note
    Falcon Finance profile meta — has_bridge_surface: false.research/protocols/falcon-finance/00-profile.meta.json §specialist_flags.has_bridge_surface: falseretrieved 2026-05-12

Methodology #

Detect whether a bridge validator or signer-set change has been proposed or executed.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol falcon-finance factor RD-F-103 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-12 04:06:37