Auditor re-engaged after last exploit

Falcon Finance's assessment for RD-F-083 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

No prior exploits. Factor is N/A per methodology. Gray: proactive audits (Zellic x2, Pashov x1) are pre-launch hygiene, not post-exploit re-audits.

Detail #

Methodology: gray = no prior exploits. 3 audit engagements (Pashov 2025-02-17, Zellic 2025-03-07 for USDf/sUSDf, Zellic undated for FF token) are all proactive pre-launch audits. None triggered by an incident.

Sources #

Curator note
Auditor re-engaged after exploit — gray (no prior incidents)No prior exploits; factor N/A. Proactive audits do not trigger this factor.retrieved 2026-05-12
URL
Falcon Finance — audits documentationFalcon Finance audits pageretrieved 2026-05-12

Methodology #

Determine whether a reputable auditor performed a re-audit or incident review after the most recent exploit.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol falcon-finance factor RD-F-083 score gray collected_at 2026-05-12 04:06:37