Signed/unsigned arithmetic confusion
EigenLayer's assessment for RD-F-018 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No published audit finding identifies signed/unsigned arithmetic confusion. Solidity 0.8.x default overflow protection; unchecked blocks used explicitly where intended. Certora formal verification would detect type-confusion arithmetic via invariant proofs.
Sources #
- GitHubEigenLayer audits — Certora formal verificationLayr-Labs/eigenlayer-contracts/tree/main/audits — Certora FV engagementsretrieved 2026-04-28
Methodology #
Determine whether signed-integer conversions or comparisons where unsigned was intended exist in the deployed bytecode/source.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol eigenlayer factor RD-F-018 score green collected_at 2026-04-28 13:58:44