Bridge TVL per validator ratio
Curve Finance's assessment for RD-F-157 — scored not_assessed on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
CRV OFT bridge TVL (chains: BNB, Sonic, Avalanche, Fantom, Etherlink, Kava) is collectively ~0.4% of Curve's total $1.72B TVL per DefiLlama chain breakdown — well below $10M in absolute terms for these chains. FastBridge crvUSD: subset of L2 TVL (~$30-60M total L2; fast bridge portion is a subset). TVL per validator ratio is low in absolute USD terms for both surfaces. Green: even if DVN config is single, the total CRV bridged via xDAO is small enough that bridge TVL/validator ratio is not a primary concern. [v1-deferred: only curator_note evidence; downgraded per §14 Pass 3]
Sources #
- InternalCurve Finance data cache — chain TVL distribution00-data-cache.json chain TVL: BNB 0.06% + Sonic 0.01% + Avalanche 0.19% + Fantom 0.00% + Etherlink 0.63% + Kava 0.06% = ~0.95% of total TVL — affected bridge TVL smallretrieved 2026-04-28
Methodology #
Compute bridge TVL divided by validator count as a concentration-of-compromise measure.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →