Bridge signer-set change proposed/executed

Convex Finance's assessment for RD-F-103 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Convex is not a bridge. Fraxtal, Arbitrum, and Polygon deployments are independent per-chain Booster instances with no protocol-operated cross-chain bridge. layerzero.present: false confirmed in data cache. has_bridge_surface: false and is_a_bridge: false confirmed in profile meta.json. RD-F-103 (bridge signer-set change) is structurally inapplicable.

Sources #

Internal
Convex Finance data cache — bridge flags.research/protocols/convex-finance/00-data-cache.json — layerzero.present: false; coverage_flags.layerzero_bridge: falseretrieved 2026-05-16
Internal
Convex Finance profile meta — bridge flags.research/protocols/convex-finance/00-profile.meta.json — has_bridge_surface: false, is_a_bridge: false, cross_chain: falseretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Detect whether a bridge validator or signer-set change has been proposed or executed.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol convex-finance factor RD-F-103 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 02:41:28