defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

First-depositor / share-inflation guard

Convex Finance's assessment for RD-F-075 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Same as F074. Convex Booster is not a share-based vault and has no first-depositor attack surface. The deposit flow routes LP tokens to Curve gauges; no share-minting occurs within Convex's own contracts. Per PD-024, F075 applies only to share-based vault architectures.

Sources #

  • GitHub
    Convex Finance Platform - GitHubconvex-eth/platform: Booster.sol deposit flow deposits LP tokens to Curve gauges; no share minting in Convex contracts; no first-depositor attack surfaceretrieved 2026-05-16
  • Internal
    Taxonomy Cat 4 PD-024 applicability tableresearch/outputs/03-taxonomy.md Cat 4 section: PD-024 resolution -- RD-F-075 ERC-4626 vault-onlyretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine whether the vault has a first-depositor guard (seed deposit on deploy, virtual-share offset, or floor-check).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol convex-finance factor RD-F-075 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 02:41:28