defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

ERC-4626 virtual-share offset (OZ ≥4.9)

Convex Finance's assessment for RD-F-074 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

The Booster contract (0xF403C135812408BFbE8713b5A23a04b3D48AAE31, Solidity 0.6.12) is not an ERC-4626 vault and does not use share-based accounting in an ERC-4626 pattern. No virtual-share offset mitigation is relevant. Per PD-024, F074 is applicable only to ERC-4626 vault protocols.

Sources #

  • Internal
    Taxonomy Cat 4 PD-024 applicability tableresearch/outputs/03-taxonomy.md Cat 4 section: PD-024 resolution -- RD-F-074 ERC-4626 vault-onlyretrieved 2026-05-16
  • Etherscan
    Convex Finance Booster - EtherscanBooster 0xF403C135812408BFbE8713b5A23a04b3D48AAE31: Solidity 0.6.12 (predates ERC-4626 standard); no ERC-4626 interface in deployed bytecoderetrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine whether ERC-4626 vaults use OpenZeppelin ≥4.9 virtual-share offset pattern to prevent first-depositor share-inflation.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol convex-finance factor RD-F-074 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 02:41:28