Chainlink aggregator min/max bound misconfig
Convex Finance's assessment for RD-F-060 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Convex does not use any Chainlink aggregator in its core contracts; min/max bound misconfig check is not applicable. The 19 Chainlink feeds in the DeFiLlama/data cache oracle_feeds[] are not consumed by Convex's own contracts.
Sources #
- GitHubConvex Finance Platform Contracts — Interfaces.sol (no Chainlink)convex-eth/platform — Interfaces.sol: no AggregatorV3Interface defined; no Chainlink feed address imported or used in any core contractretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether the Chainlink aggregator's `minAnswer` and `maxAnswer` circuit-breaker bounds are misconfigured (too wide or too narrow) for the asset class.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol convex-finance factor RD-F-060 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 02:41:28