Hot-wallet signer flag

Convex Finance's assessment for RD-F-030 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Cannot assess hot-wallet vs hardware-wallet signing without on-chain heuristics or public attestation. All signers are pseudonymous. No hardware wallet signing attestation published. Risk of hot-wallet signers cannot be confirmed or denied from public sources. [?]

Sources #

Docs
Convex Finance -- Contract Addresses (team identity context)Team identity section of profile -- confirmed anonymousretrieved 2026-05-16
Curator note
Curator note -- signing posture gapNo hardware signing attestation found; signers are pseudonymous; on-chain heuristic assessment not available via WebFetchretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine whether ≥1 multisig signer address exhibits on-chain behavior consistent with a hot wallet (web-wallet signing pattern, no hardware signing indicators).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol convex-finance factor RD-F-030 score gray collected_at 2026-05-16 02:41:28