Signed/unsigned arithmetic confusion
Convex Finance's assessment for RD-F-018 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Solidity 0.6.12 contracts use SafeMath throughout (imported and applied to all arithmetic). SafeMath prevents overflow/underflow but does not prevent all signed/unsigned confusion. However, the contracts use exclusively uint256 for all financial calculations — no signed int conversions found in source inspection of Booster, CvxLockerV2, BaseRewardPool. Low confidence without symbolic execution.
Sources #
- GitHubConvex Booster.sol (SafeMath import, uint256 arithmetic)Booster.sol - SafeMath throughout, uint256 onlyretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether signed-integer conversions or comparisons where unsigned was intended exist in the deployed bytecode/source.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol convex-finance factor RD-F-018 score green collected_at 2026-05-16 02:41:28