Formal verification coverage
Convex Finance's assessment for RD-F-009 — scored red on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No formal verification found in any Convex repository. No Certora prover specs, Kani, or Halmos proofs published. Audit list includes no FV engagement. At $613M TVL for a 5-year-old yield aggregator, absence of formal verification is a notable gap. Yellow-class at the $613M TVL band per invocation context guidance (below $1B auto-red for LSTs); however, absence of any FV effort and no declared critical invariants meets the red threshold (0% coverage).
Sources #
- GitHubConvex-eth GitHub org (no Certora/Halmos/Kani repos found)convex-eth org - no FV repos foundretrieved 2026-05-16
- Convex Finance FAQ: Audits (no FV listed)Convex audits page - no FV engagement listedretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine the percentage of protocol-declared critical invariants covered by a formal verification proof (Certora Prover, Kani, Halmos, or equivalent).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →