Bridge rate-limiter / chain-pause as positive mitigant
Concrete's assessment for RD-F-185 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Concrete is not a bridge protocol and has no bridge rate-limiter mechanism. Cross-chain pre-deposit vaults exist (Berachain, Stable Network) but no bridge rate-limiter has been identified. Factor RD-F-185 measures bridge rate-limiter as a positive mitigant — not applicable here.
Sources #
- Internal00-profile.md §7 + 00-data-cache.json — no bridge rate-limiterProfile §7: bridge mechanism unidentified; data cache layerzero.present=false; profile has_bridge_surface=uncertain (lean false); is_a_bridge=falseretrieved 2026-05-17
Methodology #
Determine whether the bridge implements a per-window outflow rate-limiter (and at what cap), and whether the protocol team can trigger a chain-level or validator-set emergency pause.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol concrete factor RD-F-185 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-17 14:36:59