Real-capital social-engineering persona
Concrete's assessment for RD-F-184 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No evidence of a real-capital social-engineering persona (Drift/UNC4736 pattern) found. Concrete is an EVM yield-vault protocol distinct from Drift's Solana architecture. No OSINT evidence of a persona building credibility via ≥$1M capital deposits prior to a social-engineering event. Deployer EOA holds only ~$1,400 in operating balances. Curator verification would be required for positive scoring; absence of public signal does not confirm absence of risk. Factor definition (F184) requires curator-confidence attribution beyond OSINT trail; gray is appropriate per the process-learnings note for this factor.
Sources #
- EtherscanConcrete: Deployer — Etherscan balance checkDeployer EOA balance — ~$1,390 in operational tokens; not credibility-building scale (≥$1M threshold per F184)retrieved 2026-05-17
- process-learnings.md — dev-identity-analyst SAVE-TIME-NEXT-TIME F184Process-learnings: F184 — mark GRAY + note Drift comparator as reference pattern; M-only OSINT; curator verification required for positive scoringretrieved 2026-05-17
Methodology #
Determine whether a curator-flagged "team contributor" or "external integrator" persona has ≥$1M of attributed real-capital deposits to the target protocol or peer protocols, potentially used to build credibility ahead of a social-engineering attack.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →