Formal verification coverage
Concrete's assessment for RD-F-009 — scored red on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No formal verification engagement found in any audit listing (docs.concrete.xyz/audits/ has 27+ entries — none are Certora, Halmos, Kani, or equivalent FV tools). GitHub repo has no spec/ directory for FV. Halborn and Cantina use manual+automated traditional auditing, not formal proof. Red — 0% formal verification coverage.
Sources #
- DocsConcrete Audit DocumentationConcrete audit list — no FV engagement listed in 27+ auditsretrieved 2026-05-17
- concrete-earn-v2-bug-bounty repositoryBug bounty repo tree — no FV spec directoryretrieved 2026-05-17
Methodology #
Determine the percentage of protocol-declared critical invariants covered by a formal verification proof (Certora Prover, Kani, Halmos, or equivalent).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol concrete factor RD-F-009 score red collected_at 2026-05-17 14:36:59