Stablecoin depeg >2% on shared-LP venue
Chainlink CCIP's assessment for RD-F-104 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
CCIP itself has no internal stablecoin dependency. As a bridge protocol, it transports stablecoins but does not hold them as collateral or use stablecoin prices for internal rate calculations. Token pool rate limits are in absolute token quantities, not USD values tied to stablecoin pegs. A stablecoin depeg affects the economic value of tokens transiting CCIP but not the protocol's cross-chain messaging security or operational integrity. The stablecoin depeg signal fires when a protocol's internal health is endangered by a collateral depeg — CCIP has no such dependency.
Sources #
- InternalChainlink CCIP profile — external dependencies.research/protocols/chainlink-ccip/00-profile.md §7 — external dependencies: CCIP has no lending book, no AMM, no stablecoin collateral exposure in core contractsretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Detect whether a stablecoin in this protocol's dependency graph depegs >2% on a venue with shared liquidity.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →