Signer rotation recency
Chainlink CCIP's assessment for RD-F-031 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No public evidence of MCMS threshold changes. The MCMS setConfig() function is available for configuration. Since signer count/threshold is not disclosed, changes are not trackable. No documented reduction events found. Threshold opacity prevents meaningful assessment of the static-axis Security-Council reduction signal.
Sources #
- EtherscanCCIP ManyChainMultiSig — EtherscanMCMS Etherscan transaction history — setConfig() function visible in ABI; no public setConfig transactions identifiedretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Measure the number of months since the most recent signer-set change (add/remove signer) on the admin multisig; flag if threshold was reduced within 14 days of a timelock removal or new-signer addition.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol chainlink-ccip factor RD-F-031 score gray collected_at 2026-05-16 01:55:09