Repo shows AI-tool co-authorship in critical files
Cap (cUSD / stcUSD)'s assessment for RD-F-172 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No AI-tool co-authorship metadata ('Co-authored-by: GitHub Copilot' or similar) found in the 20 most recent commits inspected. A '.claude' directory is present in the repo root (infrastructure tooling, not Solidity co-authorship). No AI-generated code co-authorship flags detected in security-critical contract files.
Sources #
- GitHubCap Contracts Commit History — AI Co-authorship Checkgithub.com/cap-labs-dev/cap-contracts/commits/main — 20 recent commits inspected; no AI co-authored-by trailersretrieved 2026-05-17
- Cap Contracts Root — .claude directoryRepository root contains .claude directory (infrastructure tooling, not code generation)retrieved 2026-05-17
Methodology #
Determine whether critical security files show commits with AI-tool co-authorship metadata (GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT Code Interpreter).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol cap factor RD-F-172 score green collected_at 2026-05-17 10:56:24