Hot-wallet signer flag

Cap (cUSD / stcUSD)'s assessment for RD-F-030 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Signer addresses not tied to public identities. Cannot assess hardware vs. hot-wallet signing patterns from available data. Behavioral heuristic requires Chainalysis-style feed.

Sources #

Curator note
Hot-wallet assessment — insufficient dataNo chain analytics feed available. Signing history of 5 signer addresses not attributable to hardware vs. software wallet without behavioral analysis.retrieved 2026-05-17

Methodology #

Determine whether ≥1 multisig signer address exhibits on-chain behavior consistent with a hot wallet (web-wallet signing pattern, no hardware signing indicators).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol cap factor RD-F-030 score gray collected_at 2026-05-17 10:56:24