Fork depth (generations from original audit)
BENQI's assessment for RD-F-130 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Core lending markets: fork depth 1 (direct fork of Compound V2 = audited protocol). BENQI Isolated Markets: fork depth 2 (derived from Moonwell, which is a fork of BENQI, which is a fork of Compound V2 — effectively 2 generations from the original audited Compound V2 codebase). Methodology: depth 2 = yellow. Scoring worst-case deployed component (Isolated Markets = depth 2).
Sources #
- DocsBENQI Isolated Markets ContractsBENQI Isolated Markets architecture draws on Moonwell-lineage coderetrieved 2026-05-16
- Moonwell C4 Audit — fork chainMoonwell fork chain: Compound V2 → BENQI → Moonwell → BENQI Isolated Marketsretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Count the number of fork hops from an originally audited protocol (0 = direct fork of an audited protocol, N = N-th generation).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol benqi factor RD-F-130 score yellow collected_at 2026-05-16 11:02:12