Code divergence from upstream (%)
BENQI's assessment for RD-F-129 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
BENQI lending directory contains 23 Solidity files vs Compound V2 core ~15 primary contracts. BENQI adds: multi-token reward distribution (QI + AVAX emissions added to Comptroller/QiToken), borrow caps (new parameter), Avalanche-specific collateral parameters, qisAVAX market integration, PauseGuardian.sol (additional contract). Estimated divergence: 25–40% from Compound V2 fork point based on structural comparison. Isolated Markets (Moonwell-lineage) represent a further divergence. Yellow: 20–50% divergence territory.
Sources #
- DocsBENQI Protocol Profile §5 — fork divergenceProfile §5 fork divergence assessment — moderate-to-substantial; multi-token emissions, borrow caps, sAVAX integration addedretrieved 2026-05-16
- BENQI Lending Directory — file countBENQI lending directory (23 files including multi-reward distribution) vs Compound V2 upstreamretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Measure the percentage of lines changed between this fork's deployed code and the stated upstream codebase at fork point.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →