defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Audit scope mismatch

BENQI's assessment for RD-F-001 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Ten audit engagements across 7 firms confirmed. Core lending (Halborn May 2021) and sAVAX (Certora April 2022, Halborn Nov 2021–Feb 2022) have audit PDFs with scoped contracts. Dedaub March 2023 audited Ignite at commit 498242b800b07230e81cacb6932c217ba3d07d05. Cyfrin Jan 2025 audited Ignite v2 (Ignite.sol, IgniteStorage.sol, staking.sol, ValidatorRewarder.sol). Zellic audited oracle contract. However: (a) public BENQI-Smart-Contracts repo frozen at 2023-01-11; (b) Isolated Markets (launched 2024, Comptroller 0xfc8C7271BdC3816D7AB1fc802216bad387692Ce1) rely on unverifiable 'dedicated 2024 audit' claim with no public PDF or commit SHA; (c) no deployed-bytecode vs audit-commit-SHA diff possible for Isolated Markets or post-2021 Comptroller changes. Material traceability gap for the Isolated Markets delta disqualifies a green despite extensive overall audit coverage.

Sources #

Methodology #

Check whether the commit SHA cited in the audit report matches the bytecode deployed at the production proxy/implementation address.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol benqi factor RD-F-001 score yellow collected_at 2026-05-16 11:02:12