Repo shows AI-tool co-authorship in critical files
Balancer (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-172 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No evidence of GitHub Copilot 'Co-authored-by:' tags or equivalent AI-tool disclosures in Balancer v2 or v3 monorepo commit messages found in any public analysis, news, or code review sources. Data cache: v2 last commit 2025-12-14 (post-exploit maintenance). v3 monorepo active (Certora audit 2026-01-26). Balancer Labs maintained professional security posture with $635K in 2024 audit spend — inconsistent with undisclosed AI code generation in critical paths. Confidence [?] without full commit-history scan.
Sources #
- GitHubv2 monorepo: original codebase, no upstream forkhttps://github.com/balancer/balancer-v2-monoreporetrieved 2026-05-05
- v3 monorepo: no AI co-authorship disclosure found in READMEhttps://github.com/balancer/balancer-v3-monoreporetrieved 2026-05-05
Methodology #
Determine whether critical security files show commits with AI-tool co-authorship metadata (GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT Code Interpreter).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →