Fork retains upstream audit coverage
Balancer (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-131 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Not a fork — upstream audit retention question is moot. Balancer has its own original audit coverage (11 v2 + 13 v3 engagements). N/A.
Sources #
- Curator noteOriginal protocol; upstream audit retention N/AProfile §5: original protocol; all audits are original, not inherited from upstreamretrieved 2026-05-05
Methodology #
Determine whether the fork's deployed code is covered by either: (a) the upstream audit plus a delta-audit for fork-specific changes, or (b) a fresh independent audit of the fork.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol balancer factor RD-F-131 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-05 12:41:36