ENS/NameStone identity bound to deployer
Balancer (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-117 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Deployer 0x697A71353A4BC1eb1356763018a229c27a3fbA0C does not display an ENS name on Etherscan. The address carries an Arbiscan 'Balancer: Deployer' protocol label which provides equivalent accountability for institutional deployers. DAO signer netto.eth (0x235F00a6e9416b114780F0b97aFCb40f623f65B4) has ENS identity. YELLOW reflects absence of the specific ENS/NameStone mechanism on the deployer, not an adverse signal.
Sources #
- EtherscanBalancer: Deployer | EtherscanDeployer address 0x697A71... — no ENS name shown on Etherscanretrieved 2026-05-05
Methodology #
Determine whether the deployer address has a bound ENS or NameStone name resolvable to a verifiable identity.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →