Large governance proposal queued
Balancer (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-101 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Large governance proposal queued (flagged) [T-09 v1] | Applicable: Partial — no on-chain Governor; Snapshot + Gnosis Safe execution only | Signal infrastructure must be re-mapped: ProposalCreated events do not exist (no Governor). Signal equivalent is Gnosis Safe execution events on DAO Multisig (0x10A19e7eE7d7F8a52822f6817de8ea18204F2e4f). BIP-907 (Jan 2026) and BIP-911 (Feb 2026) were executed — signer replacements, governance-sanctioned. Pending: veBAL abolition and BAL emissions-end proposals from March 2026 wind-down. No malicious-pattern payloads detected. Signal is gray due to governance infrastructure mismatch; monitoring adaptation required for Snapshot + multisig governance. | Threshold: Governance proposal queued with privileged admin payload from new/untrusted proposer | Would fire: No
Sources #
- Docshttps://docs.balancer.fi/concepts/governance/retrieved 2026-05-05
- https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-907-update-dao-multisig-signer-set-and-adjust-annual-stipend/6956retrieved 2026-05-05
Methodology #
Detect whether a governance proposal with potentially protocol-impactful payload has been queued for execution (including Security-Council threshold-reduction variant).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →