Auditor re-engaged after last exploit
Aerodrome Finance's assessment for RD-F-083 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
All 3 incidents are frontend/DNS compromises — no smart contract code was exploited. Auditor re-engagement post-exploit is not applicable for infrastructure-layer attacks. No SC audit was warranted or conducted post-incident. FTI Consulting cited as containment partner for 2025 incident, not a formal SC auditor engagement. Gray = SC re-audit not applicable for this incident class.
Sources #
- URLAerodrome and Velodrome Published Report on NameSilo HackIncrypted — post-mortem confirming frontend-only nature, FTI Consulting as response partnerretrieved 2026-05-04
Methodology #
Determine whether a reputable auditor performed a re-audit or incident review after the most recent exploit.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol aerodrome factor RD-F-083 score gray collected_at 2026-05-04 19:56:03