First-depositor / share-inflation guard
Aerodrome Finance's assessment for RD-F-075 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Not applicable: first-depositor share-inflation attack requires fungible vault shares. Aerodrome Pools AMM uses standard MINIMUM_LIQUIDITY burn to address(0) on first LP mint (Solidly/Uniswap v2 pattern) — this is a structural guard by construction. Slipstream uses NFT positions (Uniswap v3-style), not fungible shares — inflation attack does not apply.
Sources #
- GitHubAerodrome Finance Slipstream RepositoryAerodrome Slipstream repo — NFT position architecture (Uniswap v3 fork); no fungible vault sharesretrieved 2026-05-04
- Spearbit Security Review — Velodrome v2 (Aerodrome upstream)Spearbit Velodrome v2 audit (inherited by Aerodrome) — confirms MINIMUM_LIQUIDITY burn pattern in Solidly-style AMMretrieved 2026-05-04
Methodology #
Determine whether the vault has a first-depositor guard (seed deposit on deploy, virtual-share offset, or floor-check).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol aerodrome factor RD-F-075 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-04 19:56:03