Partial-drain test transactions
Across Protocol's assessment for RD-F-091 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Partial-drain test transactions | Yes | No small-value pre-drain probe transactions detected on HubPool or SpokePool contracts in the assessment window. The governance controversy (June 2025) produced anomalous ACX treasury movements but those were through legitimate governance vote execution, not contract-level test transactions. Pre-drain probing applicable to bridge if an attacker probes HubPool root bundle submission acceptance. No such pattern detected. | One or more small-value outflows...
Sources #
- Curator noteExtracted from 06-realtime-intel.md — RD-F-091; no URL citedretrieved 2026-04-28
Methodology #
Detect one or more small-value outflows prior to a larger drain that match a known pre-strike pattern (low-value same-function calls from new wallet).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →