Bridge validator co-hosting
Aave v3's assessment for RD-F-150 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
a.DI's multi-bridge design (CCIP + LZ + Hyperlane + native) inherently reduces co-hosting risk since each bridge uses different validator infrastructure. Full validator co-hosting analysis per bridge not performed in this assessment (OSINT lift). Architectural design is favorable for co-hosting independence.
Sources #
- Docsa.DI documentationa.DI multi-bridge architecture — independent validator sets per bridgeretrieved 2026-04-27
Methodology #
Determine whether validators share ASN or data-center/custodian per on-chain and OSINT inference.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol aave-v3 factor RD-F-150 score yellow collected_at 2026-04-27 23:28:46